Pitched roof coverings 2: Concrete tile, slate & rubber

Concrete tile and slate
Fibre cement slate
Reconstituted slate
Rubber tile / slate

 

Key issues


Embodied energy - there's a wide scale of embodied energy from wood shingles at the low end of the range to aluminium at the high. The main energy components are those derived from manufacture and transport. As with other materials, sourcing a product in the UK (and close to site if possible) can dramatically reduce its embodied energy.

Material efficiency - Selecting a material can be made more complicated once its efficiency is considered. For example in some circumstances it can be argued that a strong, lightweight material used over a large span can have a lower environmental impact than a heavier, more sustainable material once the degree of structural support is introduced into the equation.

Durability - The longer lasting roofing material has a lower environmental impact.

 

Materials

Concrete tiles and slates


concrete tiles

Concrete roof tiles and slates are perhaps the most economic form of roof covering. Concrete tiles compete directly with 'natural' clay and slate in providing a wide range of formats and colours as well as an ability to closely imitate the colour, form and texture of the original.

Concrete roof tiles and slates are typically made using a mortar mix with a sand grading known as 'sharp sand'. Iron oxide pigments are added to give the desired colours. The mix is extruded under high pressure before being placed in moulds and then cured at temperature before being coated, dried and packaged.

The main environmental impact of concrete tiles and slates is of course as part of its cement component - though it competes very well against fired clay tiles in its more modest embodied energy rating.

Pro Reusable
Pro Durable
Pro Some products use recycled aggregate
Pro Some products use cement substitutes
Con Very high levels of CO2 and other emissions as well as materials extraction associated with cement production
Con Aggregate extraction can degrade landscapes
Con Concrete can contain a range of admixtures, the impacts of which have not yet been sufficiently assessed

Thermal conductivity

Typically 0.84 W/mK (3)

Density

Typically 2100 Kg/m3 (1)

Embodied energy

2.0 MJ/kg (1)

Life expectancy

50 - 60 years

 

Fibre cement slates


fibre cement slates

Fibre cement slates are normally perceived as the economic alternative to natural slates. The slates are manufactured using Portland cement, silica and fillers together with a blend of cellulose and synthetic fibres. The mix is pigmented during production before being compressed under high pressure and air cured (though some products are autoclave-cured to accelerate the process).

What fibre cement slates lack in natural appearance, they can make up in ease and flexibility of instalment which together with a predictable uniform aesthetic can often make them the preferred design choice.

Manufacturers of fibre cement slates are quoted as saying that their products are more energy-efficient than natural slates, but this claim has yet to be demonstrated convincingly.

Pro Reusable
Pro Durable
Pro Light weight reduces roof loading
Con Very high levels of CO2 and other emissions as well as materials extraction associated with cement production
Con Synthetic polymer fibre is derived from oil, a non-renewable resource, the refining of which is responsible for SO2 and NOx emissions. The manufacture of plastic polymers is energy intensive
Con On disposal, synthetic polymers are highly persistent in the environment

Thermal conductivity

(unavailable)

Density

(unavailable)

Embodied energy

8.5 MJ/kg (8)

Life expectancy

60 years (8)


 

Reconstituted slates


slate waste

Another alternative to the use of natural slates are slates made from reconstituted crushed slate (typically 60 - 80% content). This method has the advantage of being able to make use of waste from quarrying whilst providing a close match to the appearance of pure slates.

Slates manufactured in this manner can be moulded to imitate the simple format of natural slates or to provide an interlocking facility for application on lower-pitched roofs.

Reconstituted slates are made by crushing natural slate and mixing it with other aggregate, pigment, resin and glass-fibre reinforcement. The mix is then applied to a mould where it is heated and compressed.

Pro Manufactured from post-industrial waste
Pro Reusable
Pro Durable and highly resistant to airborne pollution
Con Slate extraction causes landscape degradation
Con Resin is derived from oil, a non-renewable resource, the refining of which is responsible for SO2 and NOx emissions. The manufacture of plastic polymers is energy intensive
Con Reworking of slates might create hazardous dust 4

Thermal conductivity

Typically 1.5 W/mK (9)

Density

Typically 2100 Kg/m3 (9)

Embodied energy

(not currently available)

Life expectancy

60+ years (9)

 

Rubber tiles / slates


rubber slate

Using waste as a raw material is highly desirable - reducing the quantity of material heading for landfill whilst reducing the environmental damage resulting from the extraction and processing of raw materials.

Recent developments led by WRAP have developed techniques whereby tyres are ground down to produce rubber granulate. The granulate is moulded to form tiles or slates which benefit from low weight and durability.

It is worth noting too that BBA Certification is available with some products.

Pro Up to 100% recycled content
Pro Reusable and recyclable
Pro Light weight reduces roof loading
Pro BBA Certification available on some products
Con Sometimes only sporadically available. Manufacturers tend to go in and out of business
Con Relatively untested

Thermal conductivity

n/a

Density

Typically 1100 Kg/m3 (2)

Embodied energy

n/a

Life expectancy

20+ years 2

 


Roof tile and slate products on GreenSpec

 


References


1 Inventory of Carbon & Energy (ICE) - Version 1.6a - Hammond & Jones, Univ Bath
2 Dynaslate
3 CIBSE Guide A 1999
4 Sandtoft safety data sheet
6 Source: Lawson Buildings, Materials, Energy and the
Environment (1996)
8 Marley Eternit, from a written response 2010
9 Monier, from a written response 2010
3 CIBSE Guide A 1999

 

 


Disclaimer


GreenSpec accepts no responsibility or liability for any damages or costs of any type arising out of or in any way connected with your use of this web site. Data and information is provided for information purposes only, and is not intended for trading purposes. Neither GreenSpec nor any of its partners shall be liable for any errors in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon.